|
Several attempts have been made at rendering some parts of the wine market more liquid - and more transparent and efficient at the same
time. But could these initiatives also bring about more stability to the prices paid to wine/grape producers as well as to those charged to consumers?
Futures contracts are a powerful financial instrument that makes it possible to transfer price volatility (also called 'risk') from people who seek to avoid it to those who wish to take it. Since September 2001, risk-averse producers of Bordeaux
en primeur and merchants dealing in these fine wines from anywhere in the world have had the opportunity to reduce their exposure to risk by trading in wine futures - for the first time ever. The necessary liquidities for this to happen was provided by investors ('speculators'). Whilst en primeur wines are themselves typical
forwards, futures present
investors with the possibility to trade in standard, interchangeable contracts at any time before they reach maturity.
In September 2001 Euronext
launched what should be considered as the world's first proper wine futures under the name 'Winefex Bordeaux', for the 2000 and 2001
vintages. This came weeks after the UK-based Bordeauxindex.com had opened up its own 'two-way price service for Bordeaux 2000' en primeur – a wine derivative too.
The main difference between the two services is that whilst Bordeauxindex.com agrees to act as an honest broker (market maker) and, thus, to buy and
sell contracts in some 35 individual wines in a continuous way, the futures exchange Winefex.com offered three contracts, one in each of the three categories of wines defined on a basket of 140 Bordeaux labels, all
with an en primeur history of at least two years. Winefex also enjoyed the expertise of Europe's leading futures exchange as Euronext, who owns both MATIF and LIFFE, runs it.
The advent of 'wine futures' is giving many a wine businessman the jitters however, mainly because of the populist view that futures can only add to
market instability. Yet according to The Economist,
in January 2001, trading on Bordeauxindex.com was already having a sobering effect on the inflated en primeur price of the 2000 vintage and was likely to impact on the next. The price of the 2001 vintage was, in fact, traded on the Winefex exchange and the next futures contracts that were to open in July, for the 2002 vintage (i.e. months before the grapes are even picked and nearly a year prior to the hitherto official date at which the en primeur prices are officially announced – in the spring following harvest), should have come to reinforce futures' stabilising properties.
Proper futures contracts allow hedging
to take place – a proven technique used by buyers and sellers in physical markets elsewhere, with a view to minimising their individual exposure to risk. Typically, less than 5% of the volumes traded on futures exchanges around the world result in physical transactions taking place upon the contracts reaching maturity, because futures are essentially used for hedging, i.e. to cover – in full or in part – perfectly normal transaction against unwanted price changes.
Futures can be used as an effective tool for managing risk by those willing to take the time required to understand them. The fairly complex
specification of the Winefex contracts for Bordeaux wines should not have deterred the wine trade from using these futures in their day-to-day business over the longer term. Their launch horrified the establishment and trading was suspended after a trial period of only nine months. Yet Euronext was confident that once futures' effectiveness had been proven, Bordeaux producers and traders would have overcome their usual skepticism and become keen users of them. Euronext hoped to extend futures to other categories of wines from Bordeaux (e.g. to génériques – wines that are traded in bulk, before their accréditation,
and make up 60% of the region's sizable production of 555 million litres in 2000/01) as well as from other French and foreign producing regions.
*****
Reference: Futures are dealt with in detailed fashion in Chapter 8 of The Common Wine Policy and Price Stabilization, Aldershot: Avebury/Gower,
1988. My book and an earlier doctoral dissertation at the University of Newcastle upon Tyne, proposed the introduction of futures contracts for ordinary (table) wine as a means to reducing fluctuations in income to
producers (and merchants) who wished to do so, and as an alternative to costly market intervention by the European Community.
NB: Buffer stocks schemes (buying cheap at a time of surplus to sell dear at a time of relative scarcity) are theoretically fine but usually fail
for want of courage by stock managers in the face of pressure from their political masters, with the result that stocks are piled up high until the money runs dry.
*******
DEFINITIONS
Quotations from The Economist's Guide to Financial Markets (2nd ed., by Marc Levinson. London: The Economist / Profile Books Ltd, 2000). The bits of text featured in square brackets are my own.
Futures [contracts]: "A futures contract represents a deal between two investors who may not be known to each other and are unaware of one another's motives (see below). A futures contract is a derivative, because its price and terms
are derived from an underlying asset, sometimes known as the underlying. A new contract may be created any time two investors desire to create one. Although there is a limit to the amount of copper that can be mined
in a given year, there is no limit to the number of copper futures contracts that can be traded. Motives: all futures-market investors operate from one of two fundamental motives: hedging (this involves the
use of futures or other financial instruments to offset specific risks) or speculation (this involves trading with the intention of profiting from changes in the prices of futures contracts)". [use your 'back' button to return to text]
Forwards: "Contracts that set a price
for something to be delivered in the future." NB: some draw/drew a sharp distinction between forwards and futures, the difference being that futures are interchangeable contracts (because of their standard
terms) whereas forwards are not. It is the interchangeability of the contracts that makes hedging possible. [use your 'back' button to return to text]
Hedging: "This involves futures or
other financial instruments to offset specific risks – typically against a price fall for a grower and a price rise for a buyer. In every trade the two parties take opposite positions. The buyer of the
contract, who agrees to receive the commodities specified, is said to be in a long position. The seller […] in a short position. It may not own the commodities it has agreed to deliver, but it is obliged to
have them or to pay their value in cash at the expiry of the contract. Once a trade has been completed, the participants are both obligated to the exchange rather than to each other. Either party may terminate its
contract at any point by arranging an offset [e.g. a producer deciding at any moment to end its November delivery obligation would buy – at the current price– the same number of November contracts that
he previously sold, and the two sets of contracts would cancel each other out. This is often referred to as liquidation of the initial contracts.] A hedger […] is likely to regard any loss on the futures
market as a sort of insurance premium." [use your 'back' button to return to text]
Specification: "A futures
contract contains the specifications of the transaction. The specifications of all contracts in a given commodity on a given exchange are identical, apart from the expiration date. This standardisation is an
important feature of futures markets as it makes contracts interchangeable, freeing traders and investors from the need to worry about unusual provisions. The specifications cover the following: contract size,
quality, delivery date, price limits (the smallest allowable price movement, known as a tick or a point), position limits (to prevent speculators from cornering the market by owning a large proportion of the
contracts and thus being able to manipulate the price; they do not usually apply to investors who can prove to the exchange that they are hedgers) and settlement: Most futures contracts do not lead to the actual
delivery of the underlying products. However, the contract specifies when and where delivery must be made and may provide for the alternative of cash settlement." [use your 'back' button to return to text]
EURONEXT was set up in 2000 as the merger of the Paris, Brussels and Amsterdam exchanges. The Paris exchange, Parisbourse SA, owned MATIF. Euronext acquired LIFFE
in October 2001. MATIF: Marché à
terme des instruments financiers, Paris (est. 1986). LIFFE: London International Financial Futures Exchange (est. 1982). Other futures exchanges: CBOT (Chicago Board of Trade), CME (Chicago Mercantile Exchange) and
Nymex (New York Mercantile Exchange) in the US; Eurex (Germany/Switzerland), LIFFE (UK), LME (London Metal Exchange) and MATIF in Europe; Tocom (Tokyo Commodity Exchange) in Japan) and BM&F (Bolsa de Mercadorias
& Futuros) in Brasil. [use your 'back' button
to return to text]
En primeur sales/purchases: wines sold forward in cask, in the spring following harvest.
[use your 'back' button to return to text]
|